![]() |
| Paul Baicich - Photo credit: V. Andolini |
Even people who are
terribly pinched by hard times should remember that just a few crumbs of bread
can tide a bird over its time of stress. Indeed many birds choose bread crumbs
even when bird seed is offered, and suet and bread crumbs with a bit of peanut
butter for dessert provides a banquet for many a tiny wayfarer. Of course, as
the guests increase, the menu may be enlarged as best suits them—and you.
— Ada Clapham Govan, adapted
from her letters to the Boston Daily Globe and printed in the regular
“Birds I Know” feature (ca. 1930s). Govan, a bird bander who established a bird
sanctuary on her Massachusetts property, was a friend and long-distance
correspondent of Rachel Carson.
Today, with the country still
hampered from the economic downturn of 2008 and with real unemployment as high
as it is, it may be instructive to look back at our past, to the Great
Depression to see how Americans responded, at least to bird feeding, in similar
-but far worse – times
Much of what follows is taken
from parts of Chapter 5 of our new book, Feeding Wild Birds in America
(Texas A & M University Press, 2015) by Paul J. Baicich, Margaret A.Barker, and Carrol L. Henderson.
Things were so bad in the
depths of the Great Depression that millions of Americans who had been upbeat
and optimistic in the prosperous 1920s became pessimists in the miserable
1930s. By the end of 1932, thirteen million Americans were unemployed, about a
quarter of the workforce. Many of those who still had work had their salaries
or wages cut. Industrial output declined about 50 percent and foreign trade, 70
percent. Farm income, having fallen in the 1920s, fell another 50 percent
between 1929 and 1932. Corn prices plummeted to those not seen since the Civil
War. Bankruptcy was spreading among businesses and banks; many families lucky
enough to buy a home in the 1920s lost it in the 1930s. Cities could not
collect enough taxes to pay teachers, police, and firefighters.
One would think that, with
shocking unemployment and with hungry Americans lining up for food, there would
be little sympathy for birds and little interest in keeping them housed and
fed. But interest there was, and bird feeding continued and even grew. Only a
few small businesses that were connected to bird feeding could survive the
economic downturn, but some that were flexible actually adjusted well to the
changing scene. Still, many newer feeding practices were concentrated among
avid nature enthusiasts, creative rural waste-grain users, and game-bird
professionals.
Most individuals who fed
backyard birds in the 1930s still used table scraps rather than store-bought
birdseed; they were “recycling” before there word had its current meaning. They
typically used no more than one or two homemade feeders. Indeed, with the
country deep in the Great Depression, the concept of recreational bird feeding
could be seen as a luxury, despite the fact that birds were perceived to be
under duress in winter.
In fact, it took a combination
of major habitat loss in agricultural regions and some severe winters in the
1930s to stimulate even more people to feed birds in winter. Hunters were among
the first to take action and provide food for game birds. Greater and Lesser
Prairie-Chickens, Northern Bobwhites, Ruffed Grouse, Ring-necked Pheasants, and
Gray Partridge were all vulnerable to habitat loss and inclement weather. The
particularly bad winters of the mid-1930s made a strong case that action was
needed to protect some of these birds—game bird species and others—in northern
regions.
In the 1930s, Aldo Leopold,
based at the University of Wisconsin, helped direct serious inquiry into winter
bird feeding. Leopold’s graduate student, Arthur S. “Art” Hawkins, and other
colleagues set up a series of experimental feeders for game birds that included
tepee shelters, lean-to shelters, and three-sided shelters with roofs. Each
shelter had a trough or hopper feeder offering a variety of foods, including
corn, milo (sorghum), millet, wheat, and buckwheat. Hawkins discovered that the
game birds preferred corn and that they liked to eat near food plots—grain
fields that were left unharvested, offering both food and cover. (In later
years, Hawkins would become a legend in North American waterfowl management. He
helped lay the foundation for waterfowl surveys that have been used for
decades, and he was also a tireless advocate for Wood Duck conservation.)
During this decade, the
Federal Cartridge Corporation of Minneapolis, Minnesota, also promoted winter
bird feeding. From 1933 to 1936, the company produced free conservation
advertisements with nationwide distribution. Today we would call these “Public
Service Announcements.” Federal Cartridge promoted eight guidelines for outdoor
enthusiasts, including “feed the birds in winter.”
Birdwatchers who had taken up
the pastime in the 1920s continued it in the 1930s, and their numbers actually
grew when Roger Tory Peterson had his landmark Field Guide to the Birds
published (1934, Houghton Mifflin). The
“bird book on a new plan” was a grand success. It spread the popularity of
watching and enjoying birds, from the backyard into the field.
By the start of the 1930s,
the National Association of Audubon Societies magazine, Bird-Lore, even
began to regularly feature ads for commercial feeders of all sorts. And this
approach worked well.
Of course, winters in the
North could be tough – for people and birds. Winter storms brought bitter cold
and ice to the Northeast, for example, in January and February 1935. Boy Scouts
and many others pitched in to help the birds through the conditions. Scores of
radio stations sent out the plea to feed the birds while ice covered the
ground. According to Roger Tory Peterson, “For days scarcely a program on the
air did not include an announcement about this. Everybody fed birds, from the
fire escapes of New York City to isolated snowed-in farms in the back country.”
Much of the winter feeding of
the decade was still largely a rural activity that involved making feed such as
corn or wheat available for the birds. After the commercial harvest, the
leftover corn could still be manually collected in fields to provide an
economical source of bird food. At some rural grain elevators, regular
customers often could obtain leftover mixtures of waste grain, or “scratch,” for
free, and they could then toss these mixtures into their backyards where
birds could feed on the scratch, along with bread crumbs, crackers, and table
scraps.
Over time, feeder watchers
began to realize that certain birds seemed to prefer certain grains or seeds.
The operators of grain storage elevators soon began to combine wheat, other
grains, and gray-stripe sunflower seeds for sale in fifty-pound bags.
This pattern appeared in the
practices followed by the partnership of Knauf & Tesch (today, known as
Kaytee) from Chilton, Wisconsin. Some businesses were also crossover
experiments, with seed for the domestic poultry market or for pigeons being the
starting points for expansion into offerings for wild bird feeding. One example
was Simon Wagner’s company, a precursor of the bird-feeding business later
called Wagner Brothers, which was selling seed for chicken and horses. Seed for
cage birds, pigeon feed, and pet supply items then were gradually introduced,
and the company moved toward wild birdseed in the 1930s.
With the end of the 1930s,
the country was picking itself up. The national income increased from about $40
billion in 1932 to about $71 billion in 1939. The birds benefited, too.
Feeding birds became more
“practical.” In the context of a country under duress, organizations,
individuals, and businesses learned a great deal about bird feeding in the Depression, lessons that persist today.
Comment below....
Comment below....



2 comments:
A little banquet meal for a little birdie. How sweet :) Love this.
تلعب السلالم الكهربائية دوراً كبيراً في تقليل الشعور بـ "رهاب الأماكن المغلقة" أو الإجهاد النفسي المرتبط بالتنقل تحت الأرض. ففي المحطات العميقة، توفر السلالم الكهربائية الطويلة رؤية بانورامية للمحطة وتصميماها مصاعد أوتيس العالمية، مما يمنح الراكب شعوراً بالانفتاح والسكينة بدلاً من ضيق التنفس الذي قد يصاحب صعود السلالم الضيقة المزدحمة. هذه الراحة النفسية تساهم في جعل "المترو" وسيلة النقل المفضلة للمواطنين، حيث تتحول رحلة الانتقال من مجرد "وسيلة للوصول" إلى تجربة بصرية مريحة تتماشى مع معايير الرفاهية في المدن الحديثة.
Post a Comment